![[Catalog]](/icons/catalog.gif)
![[Search]](/icons/search.gif)
![[Home]](/icons/home.gif)
![[Tell Us]](/icons/tellus.gif)
Letter to Faculty
|| Letter to Graduate Students
|| Background Documents || FAQs
|| Progress Reports by Library
Guiding Principles and General Plan
November 18, 2002
I. Background
Our campus collections space, including space in SAL 1&2,
is saturated and beyond effective and efficient shelving capacity. Enough space
to accommodate the growth of our collections for the next 10-15 years will become
available in September 2003. This new collection space, which we will refer
to as SAL3, will be a state-of-the-art high-density storage facility located
in Livermore, 50 miles from campus.
II. General Principles
The overall success of a program that uses remote storage for
a growing portion of its library materials is dependent upon a number of factors,
most important among these being
- Careful decisions on where to shelve materials, which will
include close consultation with faculty, and will take into consideration
discipline-specific needs for what must be browsable and readily available
versus what may be stored efficiently and recalled when needed;
- Reliable and timely delivery services from the remote storage
facility;
- Flexibility in relocating materials back to campus locations
when it becomes necessary;
- The ready availability of digitization facilities to deliver
shorter works by network.
III. Assumptions and Programmatic Resolutions
The work of developing a plan for the long-term housing and
management of library materials must be viewed in the broader context of a vision
of the overall role the Libraries will play in the University community and
the programs it expects to deliver in the next decades. This involves determining
not just how we fill the remote storage facility and what materials will be
relocated remotely, but rather how all collection spaces, on campus and off,
will be used for maximum responsiveness to the University’s teaching and research
programs and minimum inconvenience possible to our constituency. In this broader
context, we make the following basic assumptions and programmatic resolutions:
- On campus collection space will be used for materials that
need to be browsed or that are more frequently used.
- For the maximum efficiency of collection management with
open shelves and growing collections on campus we will maintain a fill rate
of 80-85% of shelving capacity. This fill rate will be a must for the Green
Library but may vary in the branches.
- Lowest use materials will be candidates for SAL3.
- Qualitative judgment based on discipline-specific needs
will be the primary factor in selecting where titles are to be shelved,
but statistics on usage and other factors will provide significant direction.
- All materials housed in SAL3 will have records in Socrates.
- We will strive to enhance bibliographic and table of content
access to materials in SAL3 (e.g., journals, if not indexed or otherwise available
electronically, will have a Table of Contents online).
- Our effort will be to maximize desktop access to content.
We will thus seek to add electronic content to SUL collections whenever possible.
- To the extent possible, there will be no duplication of
material on campus. Print versions of materials also available in electronic
form, as well as print duplicates, will be candidates for SAL3.
- Materials in SAL3 will be paged twice per day, with a goal
of 24-hour turnaround and direct delivery to the Green Library and the branches.
- Selection decisions will be reversible. Materials relocated
to SAL3 may be brought back if circulation or programmatic needs warrant it.
- Non-circulating materials housed in SAL3 may be recalled
for use in the Special Collections reading room or for in-house use only.
- Candidates for SAL3 may also be identified at point of acquisition
or receipt.
IV. Definitions
SUL/AIR collection space will be available at three types of
locations for the foreseeable future:
1. Browsable core locations (Green and branch Libraries);
- Browsable on campus periphery (SAL1&2). Selectors may
choose to shelve titles here that need to be browsable but are not as heavily
used as materials in core locations;
- Remote, non-browsable shelving (SAL3) which will provide
housing for
materials that do not require browsing and have low or no use.
In order to guide towards a better understanding of the types
of spaces, the following definitions, with specific examples are being provided:
1. Browsable core locations
(Green Library and the branches) are dedicated to
housing moderate to high use research materials, especially those of the types
listed below:
- Newly-published items (although not all new items are necessarily
core and may, on the judgment of the selector, be designated for remote shelving).
- Monographs and monographic series with moderate to high
use (circulation and in-house).
- Monographs (and monographic series) judged to be significant
or important for a field of study (regardless of use or circulation statistics).
- Complete or substantial runs of heavily used or significantly
important periodicals.
- Reference works in the Information Center, Humanities and
Area Studies Resource Center, Social Sciences Resource Center or branches.
- Reference works that are difficult to page from remote shelving
(e.g.
the National Union Catalogue).
- Materials that have been on Course Reserves within the last
five years.
2. Browsable on-campus periphery (SAL1/2).
Materials appropriate for this facility are those of low or moderate use
for which browsing is required or which makes research significantly more efficient
for the user. Materials are shelved here because core or remote shelving is
not feasible for space, efficiency or public access reasons. Quite often, these
materials, compared to those in core locations, may be older, slightly outdated,
bulky, and/or have not circulated much in recent years. They may be composed
of sets that researchers wish to peruse or materials that lack sufficient access
to their contents. Typical examples are:
·
Relatively long runs of series or multi-volume monographs for
which consultation requires scanning the broader set (e.g., national censuses,
encyclopedias) and for which the cost of retrieval from SAL3 would be high.
- Monographs and other materials that circulate less than
core but that are still considered important.
- Non-core materials whose value cannot be discerned through
online indexes or other finding aids (e.g. books useful for illustrations
or periodicals for advertising matter).
- Slightly outdated reference works that still have value.
- Uncatalogued materials.
- Materials we feel are important to have browsable on campus.
3. Remote non-browsable (SAL3)
Items shelved here typically have experienced recent low or
no usage and their shelving here is feasible because they have good bibliographic
access and their projected future use remains low. While they may not be critical
to current scholarship at Stanford University,
they nevertheless are worthy of retention in a research collection. Materials
that should be sent to SAL3 would include:
- Duplicates. As a general rule, where it is necessary to
retain duplicates, additional copies of a title held in a core collection
should be housed in SAL3.
- Texts that may reliably be found completely online (especially
journals and indexes) with some possible exceptions for “core” journals.
- Runs of rarely-used serials, with the indexes kept or moved
to Green or other on-campus location.
- Earlier portions of runs of active monographic series.
- Selected materials from Special Collections and University
Archives.
- Selected materials from government document collections,
especially materials not in the Library of Congress classification system.
- Stack items judged as likely candidates for theft.
- Outdated textbooks.
- Microfiche, microfilm and map collections as designated.
(A list of categories of materials designated for SAL3 in
the first three or four years is attached as Appendix 1).
V. Selection Principles
The following criteria should guide the nature of use of the
three collection shelving locations:
- The ongoing activity of identifying suitable materials for
SAL3 will be part of a larger process of intelligently shaping the Libraries’
browsable, on-campus collections in a manner responsive to the evolving needs
of readers across all disciplines.
- Materials selected for SAL1, 2, and 3 will be thoughtfully
identified by subject specialists in close consultation with faculty, students
and staff. It is expected that selection criteria will vary from discipline
to discipline as well as special program- or format-driven circumstances.
Bibliographers are expected to weigh these criteria judiciously and to deviate
from them as necessary.
- The high-density, remote facility will be devoted primarily
to infrequently used materials and to materials that do not require browsable
access.
- Materials that can benefit from the optimal environmental
and tighter security conditions should be considered for SAL3.
- Only materials with bibliographic access through Socrates
may be considered for SAL3. The aim will be to create bibliographic access
for low-use materials designated as suitable for SAL3.
- Selection for remote storage will require varying levels
of review depending on the material. Whereas entire categories of materials
may be designated for storage in SAL3, other types may need a more in-depth
and individual title review. This decision will be left up to the pertinent
subject specialist.
- The order of shelving and location of SUL/AIR research resources
will be dynamic and responsive. There will be a commitment to relocate materials
back to on-campus locations whenever research and curricular programs, as
well as discovery of errors require it.
VI. Process
Step 1. Materials stored in temporary locations such as Newark
and DataSafe will be relocated to SAL3.
Step 2. Dewey materials in SAL1/2 will be prime candidates
for SAL3. Selectors will review these classes first.
Step 3. Library of Congress classes in SAL1/2 will be reviewed
for possible relocation decisions.
Step 4. Relevant materials in core collections will be reviewed
for retention in core or relocation to SAL1/2 or SAL3.
VII. Tools to Be Provided
- Chart of selector responsibility by classification area.
All segments of Dewey and LC classes have been mapped to cognizant selectors.
- Statistical Baseline Report: All 140 LC two-letter classifications
broken down for Green and SAL1/2, by pre-1972 titles and post 1971 titles
that have never circulated.
- Individual customized statistical reports that will allow
each selector to request a list of titles by specified call number range,
further broken down by library and format and including circulation data.
Appendix 1
Categories of materials slated for relocation to SAL3 in
the first three or four years
- Newspaper backfiles;
- Selected materials from Special Collections and University
Archives;
- University Archives and Special Collections materials that
were stored in Building 160, currently housed in the Newark facility. These
include copies of SU dissertations, technical reports and University Press
titles; non-rare duplicate book collections; U.S. Atomic Energy Commission
Reports; accounting ledgers of the Business School.
- Some groups of materials currently in SAL1/2 (i.e., Cubberley
theses; Engineering technical reports; selections of government documents
collections that have seen little or no use; Stanford dissertations);
- Monographs in Dewey classes currently in SAL1/2 that have
rarely or ever circulated and which, in the judgment of the curator and faculty,
have no need to be kept in a browsable location;
- Backfiles of journals which are reliably available online
(JSTOR titles, for example);
- Duplicates;
- Closed serials with little or no use (with indexes kept
on campus or made available online);
- Many or most pre-1880 imprints -- in order to protect them
from the rigors of being on open shelves.
Last Modified:
December 19, 2002
This page maintained by:
Academic Computing Publications
Stanford University Libraries/Academic
Information Resources