skip to page content | skip to main navigation
summary
 SOCRATES  E-JOURNALS  SITE SEARCH  ASK US  TEXTONLY SULAIR HOME  SU HOME
 Catalog and Search Tools  Research Help   Libraries and Collections  Services  How To ...  About SULAIR

Tech Services Contact
  • TS Managers
  • TS Organization Chart
  • TS Expert Partners
  • Where We Are
  • Tech Services Departments
  • Access Services
  • Acquisitions
  • Metadata
  • Preservation
  • Departmental FAQ's
    Documents
  • Symphony Docs
  • Search Tech Services

    Searching tips

    Printer-Friendly Printer-Friendly     
    Tech. Services >

    Stanford University Libraries Redesign Report

    Process Change 6

    Monographs: Local Processing
    Monographs: Local Processing

    Process Change 6 Use technological enhancements to facilitate the activities of original cataloging and redesign original cataloging workflow to assign tasks across a broader range of staff.

    Assumptions

    • Approximately 15% of approval, firm order, and standing order monographs will require original cataloging or mediated copy cataloging.
    • Catalogers workstations with reference tools available on-line will increase productivity in original cataloging.
    • Redistributing cataloging tasks will reduce the average cost of original cataloging.

    Activity / Transactions Eliminated

    Original cataloging
    Reduce average cost of original cataloging
    11,174 transactions
    

    New Process Description

    Staff in the Original Cataloging units use workstations which support Windows-like functions, including cut-and-paste from authority files, and networked cataloging reference tools such as the Library of Congress Catalogers' Desktop and the Gale SUPERLCCS on CD (LC classification schedules).

    Paraprofessional staff create basic cataloging records assigning preliminary descriptive access points. The original catalogers review and revise access points, create authority records, and assign subject headings and classification. For some materials, paraprofessional/hourly staff hired for language expertise missing from the department translate bibliographic information and provide subject synopses of materials requiring original cataloging.

    Observations/Motivation for Change

    The Team noted that the output from original cataloging activity could benefit from becoming more automated and from directing more component activities to support staff.

    The original catalogers spend a good deal of time consulting manual cataloging and reference tools which now are available as networked products. Contact with cataloging departments at other universities indicated that having on-line tools for catalogers is a significant time-saver.

    The catalogers expend much time and effort compensating for lack of a full range of language expertise within the department; the Team observed that at OCLC's TechPro unit, support staff provide descriptive translations, transliterations, and subject synopses for original catalogers to use in their work. The Team concluded that a easily-defined set of support activities can more appropriately be done by variant edition catalogers and other support staff, ensuring the best of use of original catalogers' time and expertise.

    Required Actions

    • Acquire sufficient workstations with Windows-like functions
    • Select and install reference tools on workstations and on the network
    • Identify those languages for which external support is needed
    • Define components of record-creation that can be done by support staff

    bullet graphicOn to next section
    bullet graphicBack to Table of Contents
    bullet graphicBack to Tech. Services Redesign Page

    Last modified: August 12, 2005

           
    © Stanford University. Stanford, CA 94305. (650) 723-2300. Terms of Use | Copyright Complaints