skip to page content | skip to main navigation
summary
 SOCRATES  E-JOURNALS  SITE SEARCH  ASK US  TEXTONLY SULAIR HOME  SU HOME
 Catalog and Search Tools  Research Help   Libraries and Collections  Services  How To ...  About SULAIR

Tech Services Contact
  • TS Managers
  • TS Organization Chart
  • TS Expert Partners
  • Where We Are
  • Tech Services Departments
  • Access Services
  • Acquisitions
  • Metadata
  • Preservation
  • Departmental FAQ's
    Documents
  • Symphony Docs
  • Search Tech Services

    Searching tips

    Printer-Friendly Printer-Friendly     
    Tech. Services >

    Stanford University Libraries Redesign Report

    Proposed Redesign

    The elements in the Proposed Redesign scenario take into account all the principles, observations, and collective wisdom developed during the Redesign Team's study. They focus on cutting costs by eliminating duplicate transactions and handling and by using technology and vendor services, when sensible to do so, while retaining quality and improving timeliness of service.

    Essentially, the Team proposes a multi-tiered approach to processing which is responsive to SUL's commitment to collect a wide variety of material from different types of sources. This approach avoids having the exceptional need drive mainstream processes and simultaneously strives to support our ability to acquire the unique materials which are the core of Stanford's collections.

    A tiered approach allows us to cut costs where vendors, technology, and streamlined processes can increase efficiencies; it is projected that 63% of monographs within the scope of Redesign can be obtained at reduced cost via the vendor-assisted tier. The unique character of some materials requires more expensive acquisitions and cataloging processes; refinements to local processes and introduction of limited vendor services can ameliorate to some extent the cost of processing the remaining 37%. The recommended elements in the Local Processing tier address those efficiencies. Our overall cost savings will be affected directly by the percentage of materials we can direct to the first tier.

    The proposed process changes are:

    Vendor-assisted monograph processing

    Process Change 1. Acquire shelf-ready materials from vendors; defer selector's item review for both approval materials and firm orders until the materials are ready to be shelved.

    Process Change 2. Exchange data electronically with these same vendors: submit orders directly to their on-line databases and receive electronic bibliographic, holdings, and invoice information for all items supplied.

    Process Change 3. Use automated batch search services to repeat bibliographic searches when fuller cataloging copy is needed.

    Local monograph processing

    Process Change 4. Consolidate the processes of receiving and posting of payment for materials received and invoiced manually.

    Process Change 5. Use standards-based technology to support simultaneous pre-order searching of local database and of bibliographic utilities; automate batch creation of order records as a result.

    Process Change 6. Use technological enhancements to facilitate the activities of original cataloging and redesign original cataloging workflow to assign tasks across a broader range of staff.

    Process Change 7. Decentralize certain categories of catalog maintenance.

    Serials processing

    Process Change 8. Check-in all serials on-line in the service units.


    bullet graphicOn to next section
    bullet graphicBack to Table of Contents
    bullet graphicBack to Tech. Services Redesign Page

    Last modified: August 9, 2005

           
    © Stanford University. Stanford, CA 94305. (650) 723-2300. Terms of Use | Copyright Complaints